28 July 2006

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



[Federal Register: July 28, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 145)]

[Rules and Regulations]               

[Page 42758-42760]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr28jy06-5]                         



=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS



38 CFR Part 3



RIN 2900-AK21



 

Definition of Psychosis for Certain VA Purposes



AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.



ACTION: Final rule.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 

adjudication regulations to define the term ``psychosis.'' The term is 

used but not defined in certain statutes that provide presumptive 

service connection for compensation. The intended effect of this 

amendment is consistent application of these statutory provisions.



[[Page 42759]]





DATES: Effective Date: This amendment is effective August 28, 2006.

    Applicability Date: The provisions of this regulation shall apply 

to all applications for benefits received by VA on or after August 28, 

2006.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Russo, Chief, Regulations Staff 

(211D), Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits 

Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC, 20420, (202) 273-7211.



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 11, 2002, VA published in the 

Federal Register (67 FR 63352) a proposal to amend VA regulations to 

define the term ``psychosis'' as used in statutory and regulatory 

provisions concerning presumptive service connection for compensation 

or health care purposes. Interested persons were invited to submit 

written comments on or before December 10, 2002. We received three 

comments: one from the American Psychiatric Association, one from the 

American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, and one from a member of 

the general public.

    In response to the proposed rule, which referenced Diagnostic and 

Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) in the 

preamble, one commenter observed that the DSM-IV is essentially out-of-

print, having been replaced by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of 

Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR).

    As a preliminary matter, we note that DSM-IV does not differ 

materially from DSM-IV-TR as to which disorders are classified as 

psychoses. (Compare page 19 of DSM-IV with pages 19-20 in DSM-IV-TR; 

pages 273-274 in DSM-IV with pages 297-298 in DSM-IV-TR; and pages 694-

695 of DSM-IV with pages 750-751 in DSM-IV-TR). Although our proposed 

rule relied on the DSM-IV to define ``psychosis,'' we will address the 

comments to the proposed rule based on DSM-IV-TR and refer to DSM-IV-TR 

in the final rule because it is the most updated and accessible version 

of the manual. Furthermore, VA will update the regulation being added 

by this rulemaking, 38 CFR 3.384, when a new edition of Diagnostic and 

Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is published in the future.

    One commenter urged VA to replace the term ``Mood Disorder with 

Psychotic Features'' with ``Bipolar Disorder (types I and II) With 

Psychotic Features'' and ``Major Depressive Disorder With Psychotic 

Features'' because ``Mood Disorder with Psychotic Features'' does not 

appear as a listed disorder in DSM-IV, published by the American 

Psychiatric Association in 1994. The commenter noted that the 

definition of ``psychosis'' was much broader in the first edition of 

the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I), 

published by the American Psychiatric Association in 1952, compared to 

its current usage. The commenter further noted that what we now refer 

to as Bipolar Disorder (types I and II) and Major Depressive Disorder 

were considered psychotic disorders when psychosis was designated as a 

presumptive condition in 1958 by Public Law 85-857, 72 Stat. 1118.

    We have reconsidered whether Mood Disorder with Psychotic Features 

should be included in our definition of ``psychosis'' at all. We 

included it in our proposed definition because that disorder appeared 

in the decision tree for Differential Diagnosis of Psychotic Disorders 

in the DSM-IV. In the preamble to the proposed rule, at 67 FR 63352, we 

stated:



    According to DSM-IV, pages 19 and 694-695, the following mental 

disorders contain at least one of the above-mentioned DSM-IV, 

Appendix A, psychotic symptoms: psychotic disorder due to a general 

medical condition; substance-induced psychotic disorder; 

schizophrenia; schizophreniform disorder; schizoaffective disorder; 

mood disorder with psychotic features; delusional disorder; 

psychotic disorder not otherwise specified; brief psychotic 

disorder; and shared psychotic disorder.



    The proposed rule itself listed these ten disorders as psychoses. 

Neither the DSM-IV nor the DSM-IV-TR, however, lists Mood Disorder with 

Psychotic Features as a psychotic disorder. We consider the actual 

listing of psychotic disorders more significant than the appearance of 

a disorder in the decision tree. The actual listing of psychotic 

disorders in the DSM-IV-TR includes only disorders ``that include 

psychotic symptoms as a prominent aspect of their presentation,'' 

whereas disorders such as Mood Disorder with Psychotic Features ``may 

present with psychotic symptoms as associated features.'' DSM-IV-TR at 

297.

    Upon review of DSM-IV-TR and further consideration, we do not 

believe that Mood Disorder with Psychotic Features, or other disorders 

which may have psychotic features but are not listed in DSM-IV-TR as 

psychoses, should be considered psychoses for purposes of this 

regulation. Psychotic features may be temporary and not recur, but the 

disorders listed as psychoses by the DSM-IV-TR include psychotic 

symptoms as a prominent aspect of their presentation. Psychotic 

features do not necessarily show that the veteran has an actual 

psychosis. By analogy, it would be erroneous to consider a disease that 

has symptoms also found in a cancer, but which is not actually a type 

of cancer, to constitute a cancer for presumptive purposes.

    We recognize that the disorders now referred to as Bipolar Disorder 

(types I and II) and Major Depressive Disorder were once considered 

psychotic disorders. However, we note that DSM-IV-TR states that the 

definition of the term ``psychotic'' has evolved over time, and that at 

least one prior definition (contained in DSM-II, which we note was 

published in 1968) ``was probably far too inclusive.'' (DSM-IV-TR, 

Appendix C, at page 827). We believe that it is appropriate for VA to 

use current scientific knowledge in defining the term psychosis.

    For the reasons stated above, we have not included Mood Disorder 

with Psychotic Features, Bipolar Disorder (types I and II) With 

Psychotic Features, or Major Depressive Disorder With Psychotic 

Features in the definition of psychosis in the final rule.

    Citing page 297 of the DSM-IV-TR, published by the American 

Psychiatric Association in 2000, one commenter noted that catatonic 

behavior is also a psychotic symptom. This commenter suggested that we 

include the following disorders within the definition of psychosis: 

``Catatonic Disorder Due to a General Medical Condition,'' ``Major 

Depressive Disorder [W]ith Catatonic Features,'' ``Bipolar I Disorder 

[W]ith Catatonic Features'' and ``Bipolar II Disorder [W]ith Catatonic 

Features.''

    Our review of DSM-IV-TR confirms the commenter's assertion that 

catatonic behavior is also a psychotic symptom. However, as stated 

above, we do not believe that all disorders presenting with psychotic 

features should be considered psychoses. Only disorders listed by the 

DSM-IV-TR as psychotic disorders should be considered psychoses. We 

therefore decline to accept this suggestion.

    One commenter suggested we add ``dementia with delusions'' to the 

definition of psychosis because dementia is often accompanied by 

psychotic symptoms. That commenter stated that other government or 

private entities could adopt such a definition and use it in other 

contexts. Another commenter suggested we add ``Vascular Dementia with 

Delusions'' to the definition of psychosis because delusions are 

considered a psychotic symptom.

    We decline to adopt the first suggestion because ``dementia with 

delusions'' is not a specific DSM-IV-TR diagnosis. However, Vascular 

Dementia



[[Page 42760]]



With Delusions is a specific DSM-IV-TR diagnosis and its symptoms may 

be psychotic. However, as stated above, we do not believe that all 

disorders presenting with psychotic features should be considered 

psychoses. Only disorders listed by the DSM-IV-TR as psychotic 

disorders should be considered psychoses. We therefore decline to 

accept this suggestion.

    One commenter urged VA to adopt a policy of accepting a treating 

physician's diagnosis as absolute. This suggestion is outside the scope 

of this rulemaking, and we have made no change based on it.

    This commenter also stated that VA should eliminate its proposed 

definition of psychosis and accept evidence of any disorder listed in 

DSM-IV as sufficient for adjudication purposes. DSM-IV lists numerous 

mental disorders that are not classified as psychoses (e.g. anxiety 

disorders). Furthermore, certain presumptions of service connection 

apply to psychoses but not other mental disorders. We therefore make no 

change based on this comment.

    This commenter also stated that VA should not create any definition 

of psychosis because it would create more red tape and place an 

additional burden on veterans. For the reasons stated above and in the 

supplementary information for the proposed rule, we believe that 

adopting a clear definition of psychosis will actually make the claims 

process simpler for veterans seeking service connection for a 

psychosis. We therefore decline to make any change based on this 

comment.

    We have made one non-substantive formatting change to proposed 38 

CFR 3.384 by listing the different psychoses in alphabetical order. We 

believe this change will make it easier for the reader to quickly 

locate a particular psychotic disorder.

    In the preamble to the proposed rule, we noted that a statute 

authorizing health care, specifically 38 U.S.C. 1702, uses the term 

``psychosis'' and that new Sec.  3.384 was intended to affect the 

application of that statute. The references to health care, and to 

section 1702 in particular, were erroneously included in the preamble, 

and we wish to clarify that, as stated in the proposed regulation text, 

new Sec.  3.384 only concerns presumptions of service connection under 

38 CFR part 3, which governs adjudication with respect to compensation, 

pension, dependency and indemnity compensation, and burial benefits, 

but not health care.



Paperwork Reduction Act



    This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of 

information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-

3521).



Regulatory Flexibility Act



    The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 

as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-

612. The reason for this certification is that this amendment would not 

directly affect any small entities. Only VA beneficiaries could be 

directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this final 

rule is exempt from the initial and final regulatory flexibility 

analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.



Executive Order 12866



    Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and 

benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, 

and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Order 

classifies a rule as a significant regulatory action requiring review 

by the Office of Management and Budget if it meets any one of a number 

of specified conditions, including: Having an annual effect on the 

economy of $100 million or more, creating a serious inconsistency or 

interfering with an action of another agency, materially altering the 

budgetary impact of entitlements or the rights of entitlement 

recipients, or raising novel legal or policy issues. VA has examined 

the economic, legal, and policy implications of this final rule and has 

concluded that it is a significant regulatory action because it may 

raise novel legal and policy issues under Executive Order 12866.



Unfunded Mandates



    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 

1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and 

benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by 

State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the 

private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for 

inflation) in any year. This final rule would have no such effect on 

State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.



Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance



    The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and 

titles for this rule are as follows: 64.101, Burial Expenses Allowance 

for Veterans; 64.109, Veterans Compensation for Service-Connected 

Disability; and 64.110, Veterans Dependency and Indemnity Compensation 

for Service-Connected Death.



List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3



    Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits, 

Health care, Pensions, Radioactive materials, Veterans, Vietnam.



    Approved: April 18, 2006.

Gordon H. Mansfield,

Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.



0

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 38 CFR part 3 is amended as 

follows:



PART 3--ADJUDICATION



Subpart A--Pension, Compensation, and Dependency and Indemnity 

Compensation



0

1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart A continues to read as 

follows:



    Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless otherwise noted.



0

2. Section 3.384 is added under the undesignated center heading

    ``Rating Considerations Relative to Specific Diseases'' to read as 

follows:





Sec.  3.384  Psychosis.



    For purposes of this part, the term ``psychosis'' means any of the 

following disorders listed in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of 

Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, of the American 

Psychiatric Association (DSM-IV-TR):

    (a) Brief Psychotic Disorder;

    (b) Delusional Disorder;

    (c) Psychotic Disorder Due to General Medical Condition;

    (d) Psychotic Disorder Not Otherwise Specified;

    (e) Schizoaffective Disorder;

    (f) Schizophrenia;

    (g) Schizophreniform Disorder;

    (h) Shared Psychotic Disorder; and

    (i) Substance-Induced Psychotic Disorder.



(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 1101, 1112(a) and (b))

[FR Doc. E6-12079 Filed 7-27-06; 8:45 am]



BILLING CODE 8320-01-P